ABOUT ME

 

Nick Ragone is an author, attorney and public relations executive in New York City. He earned a bachelor’s degree in history and political science from Rutgers University, and is a graduate of the Eagleton Institute of Political Science at Rutgers University (undergraduate) and the Georgetown University Law Center.

He is the author of three books: Essential American Government, Everything American Government, and President's Most Wanted. Nick is a regular contributor to the Fox News Channel and Fox Business, the PIX11 Morning Show, and has a weekly appearance on the popular Raph Bailey Radio Show.  He co-anchored PIX11's five-hour live inauguration coverage with Jim Watkins and Kaity Tong.

Nick is a contributor to Donklephant.com, one of the most influential political blogs on the web, and  has written for US News & World Report, The Star-Ledger, Real Simple Magazine and RealSimple.com.  Nick has been quoted in over two dozen stories on politics, the presidency, and public relations.  In December of 2007, Nick was named one of PR Week's 40 under 40 to watch, and in May of 2008 was featured in "Profiles of Success", a book about public relations. Nick lives in Jersey City, NJ, with his wife and two children, and spends what little free time he has obsessing on the Mets.

Nick can also be found on Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=740817853


Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Search
Subscribe
Powered by Squarespace

We are a member of...
Add to Technorati Favorites
BlogToplist.com  Politics Top Blogs

Blogcatalog.com Political Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

Login
« But, will they follow him? | Main | The worst defeat in history? »
Sunday
Jun082008

Closing the book on Hillary .... and Bill, for now

Assuming -- and it's a pretty good assumption -- that Barack Obama doesn't put Hillary Clinton on the ticket, where does that leave Hillary and the Clinton legacy?

Was Hillary's loss a repudiation of her alone, or of the Clinton presidency as well? Was it a product of Clinton fatigue, or simply the product of a mismanaged campaign?

clinton2xart280_1.jpgThere's no doubt that the Clinton legacy took a hit in this campaign.  Bill Clinton tarnished himself, and the vaunted Clinton Machine doesn't seem nearly as vaunted anymore; they'll both have a lot of fences to mend before they're totally square with the Democratic base again.  But does this mean the end of the line for the Clintons' as national players? 

Probably so for Bill.  I can't imagine him getting involved in any meaningful way at the national level after this pitiful performance.  Like an aging athlete who refuses to acknolwedge the passing of time, Bill stuck around for one too many seasons, and it showed.  He may still stump for Democratic candidates here and there, but his days at the party's guiding light are over.   As Chuck Todd said, this is Barack Obama's party now, and it's not big enough for Bubba and Obama. 

Hillary, on the other hand, has lots of options.  She can return to the senate and become a powerhouse, much like Teddy Kennedy following his failed run in 1980.  Or she could run for Governor of New York and rule in Albany indefinitely.  Who knows, maybe someday she'll sit on the Supreme Court or serve as Attorney General.   But as far as running for president again, this may have been her last, best chance. 

Assuming Obama wins in the fall, it means that Hillary would be 68 in 2016 -- certainly not too old to run (McCain is 72), but not a slam dunk, either.  It's hard to see her running at that age, but it shouldn't be ruled out. 

Should McCain win, however, there's no doubt that some of the blame will be placed on Hillary for beating  up Obama during the primary season.   How much blame really depends on how hard she campaigns for Obama, but it will certainly determine if she has any standing within the party to run again in 2012.   No doubt that Hillary understands this, and will likely go all-out for Obama -- or what appears to be all-out -- simply to preserve the option of running in 2012. 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

Hi, Nick!

You might create a post about selecting a VP in general. How much freedom does the candidate have to choose? How much power does the party have in the selection? In over-riding the candidate's choice? I recall that Kennedy was forced to accept Johnson, though he didn't want him.

Thanks!

June 9, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterBJ

Definitely a good and topical post. I did an earlier one speculating on McCain's potential Veep picks, and did a segment on Fox News about it. Time to probably speculate on Obama ...

June 9, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterNick

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>